The South Carolina Regional Housing Authority No. 1 is a Section 8 and Public Housing Public Housing Agency in Laurens, South Carolina.
The South Carolina Regional Housing Authority No. 1 serves Abbeville County, McCormick County, Saluda County, Anderson County, Pickens County, Oconee County, Cherokee County, Edgefield County, Laurens County, Honea Path, Abbeville, Ware Shoals, Calhoun Falls, Mccormick, Saluda, Ridge Spring, Anderson, Clemson, Pelzer, Belton, Iva, Easley, Pendleton, Williamston, Piedmont, West Pelzer, Liberty, Central, Pickens, Seneca, Walhalla, Westminster, Gaffney, Blacksburg, Chesnee, Edgefield, Johnston, Laurens, Clinton, Joanna, Antreville, Arial, Centerville, Clarks Hill, Cross Hill, Donalds, Due West, East Gaffney, Fair Play, Gray Court, Homeland Park, Lake Secession, Lowndesville, Modoc, Mount Carmel, Mountville, Murphys Estates, Newry, Norris, Northlake, Parksville, Plum Branch, Powdersville, Princeton, Salem, Six Mile, Smyrna, Starr, Trenton, Utica, Ward, Waterloo, Watts Mills, West Union and Willington.
As of the most recent VMS report, South Carolina Regional Housing Authority No. 1 manages 1,651 active Housing Choice Vouchers.
The following is a summary of the types of vouchers managed and the monthly costs of each:
|Standard||Tenant Protection||Ported Out|
|Monthly Cost Per Voucher||$391||$283||$788|
According to the 2016 Q4 Picture of Subsidized Households database, the housing authority's voucher program has an annual turnover of 11% having issued approximately 149 vouchers in the past year. The average voucher holder has received housing benefits for 7 years and 6 months. According to the 2016 PSH database, persons who were issued a voucher in the preceding 12 months waited an average of 20 months on the waiting list1.
According to 2016 Q4 Picture of Subsidized Households data, the average voucher household contains 2.1 persons and has a household income of $12,059 per year. 93% of households were very low income (VLI) and 59% were extremely low income (ELI). 20% of households had wages as a major source of income, 0% of households had welfare (TANF, General Assistance or Public Assistance) as their primary source of income, and 75% of households had other income (Social Security, Disability or Pension) as their major source of income.
1% of households were headed by a person 24 years old or less, 46% were headed by a person 25 to 49 years old, 23% were headed by a person 51 to 60 years old, and 31% were headed by a person 62 years old or older. In addition, 2% of households were headed by a person 85 years old or older.
39% of households included children, 1% of which had two adults in the household. 38% of households with children have a female head of household. 88% of all households were headed by a female.
68% of all voucher households were headed by minorities with 68% of all heads of households being Black and 0% being Hispanic.
Of all households participating in the South Carolina Regional Housing Authority No. 1 Housing Choice Voucher program, 26% include at least one person with a disability. 49% of households with a head of household 61 years or less were headed by a person with a disability. 48% of households headed by someone 62 or older were headed by a person with a disability.
20% of voucher holders reside in a home with zero or 1 bedroom, 41% with 2 bedrooms and 39% with 3 or more bedrooms. 41% of voucher recipients are considered overhoused, meaning they occupy a rental unit larger than their family size requires.
The average monthly tenant contribution to rent by South Carolina Regional Housing Authority No. 1 voucher holders in 2016 was $300 and the average monthly HUD expenditure per voucher holder was $493. The average utility allowance across all voucher recipients is $176.
1. This Picture of Subsidized Households data field is the average wait time of those who received a voucher in the preceding 12 months. Due to special voucher programs like VASH, recent waiting list purges, or waiting list preferences the average wait time can vary significantly from one year to the next and it is entirely possible many current applicants on the waiting list have been waiting for assistance for far longer.